Current:Home > NewsSecretly recorded videos are backbone of corruption trial for longest -GrowthProspect
Secretly recorded videos are backbone of corruption trial for longest
View
Date:2025-04-17 21:17:08
CHICAGO (AP) — Hours of secretly recorded videos and phone calls have offered a rare glimpse into how the longest-servinglegislative leader in American history operated behind closed doors.
As the corruption trialof former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan stretches into its third month, testimony has covered his multiple alleged schemes, from kickbacks involving the state’s largest utility company to Chinatown developments benefiting his private tax firm.
Jurors have heard from a congresswoman, former state legislators and the government’s star witness: a former Chicago alderman who secretly wore a wire.
Here’s a closer look at the ongoing trial:
The charges
Madigan, who was speaker for over three decades, is chargedin a 23-count indictment for bribery, racketeering, wire fraud and other crimes.
Prosecutors allegehe exploited his unmatched influence not only as the Illinois House speaker but also as head of the state’s Democratic Party for personal gain and to amass even more power. A tax attorney, he’s also accused of benefiting from private work that was illegally steered to his law firm.
The trial has shown how Madigan worked, with the lines between his political and personal roles intertwined.
For instance, meetings often took place at his downtown law office, whether they were for political or legal work. Elected officials or his political advisors were often present alongside business contacts. Even in meetings about tax work, he was called “the speaker,” the recordings show.
In one 2014 meeting secretly recorded by a businessman also working undercover, a City Council member introduced Madigan to hotel developers for a Chinatown project. Madigan pitched his firm’s business.
“We’re not interested in a quick killing here. We’re interested in a long-term relationship,” Madigan said. “In terms of the quality of representation that you get from this law firm, we don’t take a second seat to anybody. “
Afterward, the alderman told a businessman: “If he works with the speaker, he will get anything he needs for that hotel.”
Star witness
One of the most-anticipated parts of the trial has been the testimony of former Chicago Alderman Danny Solis. A council member for 23 years, Solis led the powerful zoning committee.
As Madigan sought business for his tax firm, Solis met with Madigan over projects in the alderman’s ward, which then included Chinatown and the trendy West Loop neighborhood near downtown.
But unknown to everyone — including his family — Solis was working for federal agents, recording meetings and phone calls.
“It was critical that the undercover work I was doing remain secret,” Solis, 75, testified in court.
He told jurors that federal agents approached him in June 2016 and he agreed to cooperate to avoid prison for admitted wrongdoing including bribery.
However, Solis could be a problematic witness.
He faced massive financial issues, marital problems after an affair and ethical lapses, including accepting favors from a developer who arranged for Solis to get Viagra and massages “that turned sexual.” He also testified he acted on requests from federal agents, including proposing that Madigan appoint him to a board after he left office.
Defense attorneys called Solis unreliable and blasted his financial wrongdoing, including misspending campaign funds for a trip to Puerto Rico, his son’s school tuition and a car.
“As an alderman and as chair of the zoning committee, you committed many crimes, is that correct?” Madigan attorney Daniel Collins asked Solis during cross examination.
“Yes,” Solis said.
Other witnesses have included U.S. Rep. Nikki Budzinksi, who testified about Madigan’s influence in 2018 while she worked as an advisor for Gov. JB Pritzker.
The recordings
Some of the Solis videos are shaky and it’s unclear how he recorded them. There’s extended footage of ceilings and office walls. Many calls are short.
But they show how Madigan, who famously didn’t have a cellphone or email address, operated.
In January 2018, Madigan called up Solis and asked about a proposed West Loop apartment building.
“Is that going to go ahead? You know why I’m interested,” Madigan says.
Solis asks if Madigan knew the developers.
“No, but I’d like to,” he says.
Solis told jurorsthat Madigan’s influence would be helpful to him, so he provided introductions.
“I wanted to curry political favor with Mr. Madigan,” Solis told jurors.
The schemes
A sweeping investigation of public corruption in Illinois has already produced convictionsof other elected officialsand Madigan’s former chief of staff.
Among other schemes, Madigan is accused of using his influence to pass legislation favorable to electric utility ComEd. In return, ComEd allegedly offered Madigan loyalists kickbacks, contracts and jobs where they did little or no work.
“When Madigan saw an opportunity to enrich himself, he took it,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Sarah Streicker told jurors.
Defense attorneys have painted Madigan as a devoted public servant, calling him “incorruptible.”
Madigan, who has has “adamantly” denied wrongdoing in the past, hasn’t spoken publicly during the trial. He spends the proceedings watching witnesses and jurors intently, often taking notes. Family members including his daughter, former Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, have attended court.
Also standing trial with Madigan is longtime confidant Michael McClain, 76, who already has been found guilty in a separate, related case. Last year, federal jurors convicted McClain and three others of the bribery conspiracyinvolving ComEd.
The trial is expected to extend into mid-January.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (47)
Related
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Missing Titanic Submersible Passes Oxygen Deadline Amid Massive Search
- The Pandemic Exposed the Severe Water Insecurity Faced by Southwestern Tribes
- How Kim Kardashian Really Feels About Hater Kourtney Kardashian Amid Feud
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Missing Sub Passenger Stockton Rush's Titanic Connection Will Give You Chills
- Inside Clean Energy: Net Zero by 2050 Has Quickly Become the New Normal for the Largest U.S. Utilities
- Titanic Submersible Disappearance: Debris Found in Search Area
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Billy Baldwin says Gilgo Beach murders suspect was his high school classmate: Mind-boggling
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Northwestern fires baseball coach amid misconduct allegations days after football coach dismissed over hazing scandal
- What to know about the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio
- Gabby Douglas, 3-time Olympic gold medalist, announces gymnastics comeback: Let's do this
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- In a Bold Move, California’s Governor Issues Ban on Gasoline-Powered Cars as of 2035
- Tina Turner's Son Ike Jr. Arrested on Charges of Crack Cocaine Possession
- Kim Kardashian and Hailey Bieber Reveal If They’ve Joined Mile High Club
Recommendation
Small twin
Microsoft vs. Google: Whose AI is better?
Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick’s Son James Wilkie Has a Red Carpet Glow Up
Looking for a New Everyday Tote? Save 58% On This Bag From Reese Witherspoon’s Draper James
Average rate on 30
When an Oil Company Profits From a Pipeline Running Beneath Tribal Land Without Consent, What’s Fair Compensation?
One of the most violent and aggressive Jan. 6 rioters sentenced to more than 7 years
Meet the judge deciding the $1.6 billion defamation case against Fox News