Current:Home > MyAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -GrowthProspect
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
Burley Garcia View
Date:2025-04-09 23:19:55
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (945)
Related
- Woman dies after Singapore family of 3 gets into accident in Taiwan
- Scientists trying to protect wildlife from extinction as climate change raises risk to species around the globe
- Iran fires at apparent Israeli attack drones near Isfahan air base and nuclear site
- Man dies in fire under Atlantic City pier near homeless encampment
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Did Zendaya Just Untangle the Web of When She Started Dating Tom Holland? Here's Why Fans Think So
- Stocks waver and oil prices rise after Israeli missile strike on Iran
- Trader Joe's recalls basil from shelves in 29 states after salmonella outbreak
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Music Review: Taylor Swift’s ‘The Tortured Poets Department’ is great sad pop, meditative theater
Ranking
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Florida baffles experts by banning local water break rules as deadly heat is on the rise
- Video of 2 bear cubs pulled from trees prompts North Carolina wildlife investigation but no charges
- '30 Rock' actor Maulik Pancholy speaks out after school board cancels author visit
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Sophie Kinsella, Shopaholic book series author, reveals aggressive brain cancer
- With Oklahoma out of the mix, here's how Florida gymnastics can finally win it all
- Not a toddler, not a parent, but still love ‘Bluey’? You’re not alone
Recommendation
Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
Will Taylor Swift add 'Tortured Poets' to international Eras Tour? Our picks.
Start of Sen. Bob Menendez’s bribery trial is delayed a week to mid-May
The most Taylor Swift song ever: 'I Can Do it With a Broken Heart' (track 13 on 'TTPD')
Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
Music Review: Taylor Swift’s ‘The Tortured Poets Department’ is great sad pop, meditative theater
Taylor Swift Surprises Fans With Double Album Drop of The Tortured Poets Department
A convicted rapist is charged with murder in the killing of a Connecticut visiting nurse